subjectivity!??
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=XC-SdRzRJuU&si=uoPKrMZqOAkVvxGC&fbclid=IwAR0YBTRS_CMwke2yqzgA_sVPK4BK7YmfNFHN75wk8O4CKczZdso2xmUrbv4
* translation from Portuguese language!
I.e. I'm curious about politics but I try to study as little as possible, the framework of a previous personal history of a political profile and candidate(i.e. political party), before voting in an election(?).
To achieve a "possible transparency", from their applied political measures, even individuals actions, even if of contradiction regarding any secrecy over decades of its political party existence?
https://www.jornaldenegocios.pt/opiniao/colunistas/marques-mendes/detalhe/marques-mendes-o-caso-do-ministro-gomes-cravinho-e-grave
(...)
"In my opinion (curious); Inevitably and regardless of contradictions of the Policies defended for a general "liberalization" which reach the predicted position even by many, of extremes, "dysfunctionality", inefficiency and contradiction; but not however the "gift" which is the existence of constitutional rights, were the previous policies of defense of "liberalization" which occurred over the course of decades, and which gave political power and mandates; despite growing contradiction with their own past and political path, today they remain "always right" and "as Lords of thought, and reason"(?).
(...)
https://www.facebook.com/jmfernandes.eu/posts/803432637811821
https://www.foxnews.com/media/new-zealand-prime-minister-condemned-calling-regulate-free-speech-weapon-war-un"
https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/dictatorship-countries
"In my opinion (curious); Apart from, and being only irrelevant if in general the Left Politics, strategically or not, and premeditatedly or not, and under the general framework of the existing results of its policies over the course of these last decades which defended a widespread "liberalization" which invalidates nothing and which recently(?), also opted for a "crude" and common struggle for power; being demonstrated by acts to the detriment of the attempted loss even of freedom of expression?
An option for a banal conquest and common in History, but for power?
But after having achieved in general results of acceptance by the population, through acts of defense of more constitutional rights?
A contradiction demonstrated by evidence of a struggle for power?
What happened(?), or is there no longer a belief in the moral superiority of the left?"
(...)
"Text/Title: The decaying of Humanity/ Intelligent Leaderships, are nothing, in opposition, to loyalty values.
In my opinion(amateur) ; Leaderships is nothing without loyalty, integrity(intelectual), and zeal(i.e. human race); intelligence "alone and isolated" is a stain of Humanity's future; it favours "corruption's passiveness", amongst all other leadership's criminal actions(?).
Against myself my speech may appear, but I rather "vote and elect '' a true leader, than a simulacrum that achieves poorly with mediocrity, due to isolated self-interests and lack vision, regarding the whole of Humanity's future as a Race(?).
The "age" of intelligence most "perish"(i.e. detriment, partially) so that the Humans has a race prevail and win without ambiguities; to thrust in intelligence(intellectual skills) in second degree of logic, or has complementary to the mentioned values; may allow the Race's path to be linear, regarding victory, and short in comparison of time, than other options(?).
OBS: The use of only Ethics is precious, but still ineffective.
Luis Maduro. "
https://www.facebook.com/TheternalsonBstrdson/posts/1247136555438600
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=2675710692581172&id=100004268026715